Law Firm News
Today's Date: Bookmark This Website
Supreme Court strikes down 2 NC congressional districts
Court News Feed | 2017/05/22 10:47
The Supreme Court struck down two congressional districts in North Carolina Monday because race played too large a role in their creation.

The justices ruled that Republicans who controlled the state legislature and governor's office in 2011 placed too many African-Americans in the two districts. The result was to weaken African-American voting strength elsewhere in North Carolina.

Both districts have since been redrawn and the state conducted elections under the new congressional map in 2016. Even with the new districts, Republicans maintained their 10-3 edge in congressional seats.

Justice Elena Kagan, writing for the court, said the state did not offer compelling justifications to justify its reliance on race in either district.

The issue of race and redistricting one is a familiar one at the Supreme Court and Kagan noted that one of the districts was "making its fifth appearance before this court."

States have to take race into account when drawing maps for legislative, congressional and a host of municipal political districts. At the same time, race can't be the predominant factor without very strong reasons, under a line of high court cases stretching back 20 years.

A three-judge federal court had previously struck down the two districts. The justices upheld the lower court ruling on both counts.

The court unanimously affirmed the lower court ruling on District 1 in northeastern North Carolina. Kagan wrote that the court will not "approve a racial gerrymander whose necessity is supported by no evidence."

The justices split 5-3 on the other district, District 12 in the southwestern part of the state. Justice Clarence Thomas joined the four liberal justices to form a majority. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito and Anthony Kennedy dissented. Justice Neil Gorsuch did not part in the case.

The state insisted that race played no role at all in the creation of one district. Instead, the state argued that Republicans who controlled the redistricting process wanted to leave the district in Democratic hands, so that the surrounding districts would be safer for Republicans.


[PREV] [1] ..[1053][1054][1055][1056][1057][1058][1059][1060][1061].. [2647] [NEXT]
All
Legal News
Court News
Featured News
Court News Feed
Trending News
Top stories
Law Firm Press
Lawyer Opinion
Recent News
Legal Marketing
Politics
Law Firm News
TikTok content creators sue the U..
Chad holds presidential election ..
Trump faces prospect of additiona..
Retrial of Harvey Weinstein unlik..
Starbucks appears likely to win S..
Supreme Court will weigh banning ..
Supreme Court rejects appeal from..
Court makes it easier to sue for ..
Top Europe rights court condemns ..
Elon Musk will be investigated ov..
Retired Supreme Court Justice Ant..
The Man Charged in an Illinois At..



  Law Firm Web Design Information
At Law Promo we know the legal field - we've been making websites exclusively for lawyers and law firms since 2004. This makes us one of the most experienced law firm web design agencies, providing our services to a thousand attorneys worldwide. Law Promo can construct your law firm a brand new responsive website, or help you redesign your existing site to secure your place in the mobile world. Law firm website design by Law Promo
   Lawyer & Law Firm Websites
San Bernardino Drug Lawyers
www.bullardpowell.com
Legal Document Services in Los Angeles, CA
Best Legal Document Preparation
www.tllsg.com
Divorce Lawyer & Family Law Attorney
Divorce lawyer rockville
familylawyersmd.com
   Law Firm Blog Links
  Law Firm Planner
  Law Firm Directory
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Surry County Criminal Defense Lawyers
Yadkin County Family Law Attorneys
www.dirussolaw.com
Amherst, Ohio Divorce Lawyer
Sylkatis Law - Child Custody
loraindivorceattorney.com
Family Law in East Greenwich, RI
Divorce Lawyer - Erica S. Janton
www.jantonfamilylaw.com/about
San Francisco Trademark Lawyer
San Francisco Copyright Lawyer
www.onulawfirm.com
 
 
© www.sunlegalnews.com. All rights reserved.

The content provided on this web page has been prepared by Sun Legal News as a community service to the legal community and is in no way intended to provide professional legal advice or act as a replacement for actual consultation with an attorney in any particular cases or trying circumstances. Sun Legal News articles and comments are posted for general and legal educational purposes only and should not be used to analyze any legal matters.

Boutique Law Firm Web Design