Law Firm News
Today's Date: Bookmark This Website
Supreme Court rules against Navajo Nation member
Trending News | 2022/06/13 17:49
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that Native Americans prosecuted in certain tribal courts can also be prosecuted based on the same incident in federal court, which can result in longer sentences.

The 6-3 ruling is in keeping with an earlier ruling from the 1970s that said the same about a more widely used type of tribal court.

The case before the justices involved a Navajo Nation member, Merle Denezpi, accused of rape. He served nearly five months in jail after being charged with assault and battery in what is called a Court of Indian Offenses, a court that deals exclusively with alleged Native American offenders.

Under federal law Courts of Indian Offenses can only impose sentences of generally up to a year. The man was later prosecuted in federal court and sentenced to 30 years in prison. He said the Constitution’s “Double Jeopardy” clause should have barred the second prosecution.

But the justices disagreed.

“Denezpi’s single act led to separate prosecutions for violations of a tribal ordinance and a federal statute. Because the Tribe and the Federal Government are distinct sovereigns, those” offenses are not the same, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote for a majority of the court. “Denezpi’s second prosecution therefore did not offend the Double Jeopardy Clause.”

The Biden administration had argued for that result as had several states, which said barring federal prosecutions in similar cases could allow defendants to escape harsh sentences.

The case before the justices involves a tribal court system that has become increasingly rare over the last century. Courts of Indian Offenses were created in the late 1800s during a period when the federal government’s policy toward Native Americans was to encourage assimilation. Prosecutors are federal officers answerable to federal authorities, not tribal authorities.

Federal policy toward Native Americans shifted in the mid-1930s, however, to emphasize a greater respect for tribes’ native ways. As part of that, the government has encouraged tribes to create their own tribal courts, and the number of Courts of Indian Offenses has steadily decreased. Today there are five regional Courts of Indian Offenses that serve 16 tribes in Colorado, Oklahoma, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah. They are generally tribes with a small number of members or limited resources. Nationwide there are more than 570 federally recognized tribes.

The court said in 1978 that the Double Jeopardy clause did not bar the federal government from prosecuting a Native person in federal court after a tribal court prosecution, so the only question for the court this time was whether the rule should be different for Courts of Indian Offenses.

In July 2017, Denezpi traveled with a female member of the Navajo Nation to Towaoc, Colorado, which is a part of the Ute Mountain Ute Reservation. While there, Denezpi raped the woman.

Denezpi was first charged in a Court of Indian Offenses with assault and battery, among other things. He eventually agreed to a so-called Alford plea in the case, not admitting guilt but acknowledging that prosecutors had enough evidence that he would likely be convicted at trial. He was sentenced to time served, 140 days in jail. His prosecution in federal court followed.


[PREV] [1] ..[163][164][165][166][167][168][169][170][171].. [2647] [NEXT]
All
Legal News
Court News
Featured News
Court News Feed
Trending News
Top stories
Law Firm Press
Lawyer Opinion
Recent News
Legal Marketing
Politics
Law Firm News
TikTok content creators sue the U..
Chad holds presidential election ..
Trump faces prospect of additiona..
Retrial of Harvey Weinstein unlik..
Starbucks appears likely to win S..
Supreme Court will weigh banning ..
Supreme Court rejects appeal from..
Court makes it easier to sue for ..
Top Europe rights court condemns ..
Elon Musk will be investigated ov..
Retired Supreme Court Justice Ant..
The Man Charged in an Illinois At..



  Law Firm Web Design Information
At Law Promo we know the legal field - we've been making websites exclusively for lawyers and law firms since 2004. This makes us one of the most experienced law firm web design agencies, providing our services to a thousand attorneys worldwide. Law Promo can construct your law firm a brand new responsive website, or help you redesign your existing site to secure your place in the mobile world. Law firm website design by Law Promo
   Lawyer & Law Firm Websites
San Bernardino Drug Lawyers
www.bullardpowell.com
Legal Document Services in Los Angeles, CA
Best Legal Document Preparation
www.tllsg.com
Divorce Lawyer & Family Law Attorney
Divorce lawyer rockville
familylawyersmd.com
   Law Firm Blog Links
  Law Firm Planner
  Law Firm Directory
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Surry County Criminal Defense Lawyers
Yadkin County Family Law Attorneys
www.dirussolaw.com
Amherst, Ohio Divorce Lawyer
Sylkatis Law - Child Custody
loraindivorceattorney.com
Family Law in East Greenwich, RI
Divorce Lawyer - Erica S. Janton
www.jantonfamilylaw.com/about
San Francisco Trademark Lawyer
San Francisco Copyright Lawyer
www.onulawfirm.com
 
 
© www.sunlegalnews.com. All rights reserved.

The content provided on this web page has been prepared by Sun Legal News as a community service to the legal community and is in no way intended to provide professional legal advice or act as a replacement for actual consultation with an attorney in any particular cases or trying circumstances. Sun Legal News articles and comments are posted for general and legal educational purposes only and should not be used to analyze any legal matters.

Boutique Law Firm Web Design