Law Firm News
Today's Date: Bookmark This Website
Arizona Supreme Court upholds election challenge dismissal
Trending News | 2021/01/06 11:29
The Arizona Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a lower court decision dismissing the last in a series of challenges that sought to decerify Democrat Joe Biden’s victory in the state.

The high court ruling is the second time the majority-Republican court has turned aside an appeal of a court loss by backers of President Donald Trump seeking to overturn the results of the election. In all, eight lawsuits challenging Biden’s Arizona win have failed. It comes the day before a divided Congress is set to certify Biden’s victory.

Tuesday’s ruling from a four-judge panel of the high court agreed with a trial court judge in Pinal County that plaintiff Staci Burk lacked the right to contest the election. That’s because she wasn’t a registered voter at the time she filed her lawsuit, as required in state election contests. Both courts also agreed that she made her legal challenge too late, after the five-day period for filing such an action had passed.

Burk said in her lawsuit that she was a qualified Arizona voter, but officials said they discovered she wasn’t registered to vote. She later said she mistakenly thought “qualified electors” were people who were merely eligible to vote, and that her voter registration was canceled because election workers were unable to verify her address.

The Supreme Court said the fact that she wasn’t a registered voter was fatal to her ability to file an election challenge and that Burk admitted she knew she wasn’t registered.

“There is nothing before the Court to indicate that Appellant timely contacted the appropriate authorities to correct any problems with her voter registration,” Chief Justice Robert Brutinel wrote. “An election challenge ... is not the proper vehicle to reinstate voter registration.”

Biden won the state over Republican President Donald Trump by more than 10,000 votes and the results were certified last month.

The lawsuit brought by Burk, who isn’t a lawyer but represented herself, is nearly identical to a lawsuit dismissed in early December in federal court in Phoenix.

Burk’s lawsuit alleged Arizona’s election systems have security flaws that let election workers and foreign countries manipulate results. Opposing attorneys said the lawsuit used conspiracy theories to make allegations against a voting equipment vendor without any proof to back up claims of widespread election fraud in Arizona.

No evidence of voter or election fraud has emerged in Arizona. Despite that, Republicans who control the Legislature are pushing to review how Maricopa County, the state’s most populous, ran its election. Two subpoenas issued by the state Senate seeking an audit and to review voting machines, ballots and other materials are being challenged by Maricopa County.

Two of the failed legal challenges focused on the use of Sharpies to complete ballots were dismissed. Another lawsuit in which the Trump campaign sought inspection of ballots was dismissed after the campaign’s lawyer acknowledged the small number of ballots at issue wouldn’t have changed the outcome.

A judge dismissed a lawsuit in which the Arizona Republican Party tried to determine whether voting machines had been hacked.

Then a separate challenge by Arizona GOP Chairwoman Kelli Ward was tossed out by a judge who concluded the Republican leader failed to prove fraud and that the evidence presented at trial wouldn’t reverse Trump’s defeat. The state Supreme Court upheld that decision in an earlier ruling.

And a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit by conservative lawyer Sidney Powell, who alleged widespread election fraud through the manipulation of voting equipment. Burk’s lawsuit repeated some of Powell’s allegations word-for-word.



[PREV] [1] ..[308][309][310][311][312][313][314][315][316].. [2647] [NEXT]
All
Legal News
Court News
Featured News
Court News Feed
Trending News
Top stories
Law Firm Press
Lawyer Opinion
Recent News
Legal Marketing
Politics
Law Firm News
TikTok content creators sue the U..
Chad holds presidential election ..
Trump faces prospect of additiona..
Retrial of Harvey Weinstein unlik..
Starbucks appears likely to win S..
Supreme Court will weigh banning ..
Supreme Court rejects appeal from..
Court makes it easier to sue for ..
Top Europe rights court condemns ..
Elon Musk will be investigated ov..
Retired Supreme Court Justice Ant..
The Man Charged in an Illinois At..



  Law Firm Web Design Information
At Law Promo we know the legal field - we've been making websites exclusively for lawyers and law firms since 2004. This makes us one of the most experienced law firm web design agencies, providing our services to a thousand attorneys worldwide. Law Promo can construct your law firm a brand new responsive website, or help you redesign your existing site to secure your place in the mobile world. Law firm website design by Law Promo
   Lawyer & Law Firm Websites
San Bernardino Drug Lawyers
www.bullardpowell.com
Legal Document Services in Los Angeles, CA
Best Legal Document Preparation
www.tllsg.com
Divorce Lawyer & Family Law Attorney
Divorce lawyer rockville
familylawyersmd.com
   Law Firm Blog Links
  Law Firm Planner
  Law Firm Directory
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Surry County Criminal Defense Lawyers
Yadkin County Family Law Attorneys
www.dirussolaw.com
Amherst, Ohio Divorce Lawyer
Sylkatis Law - Child Custody
loraindivorceattorney.com
Family Law in East Greenwich, RI
Divorce Lawyer - Erica S. Janton
www.jantonfamilylaw.com/about
San Francisco Trademark Lawyer
San Francisco Copyright Lawyer
www.onulawfirm.com
 
 
© www.sunlegalnews.com. All rights reserved.

The content provided on this web page has been prepared by Sun Legal News as a community service to the legal community and is in no way intended to provide professional legal advice or act as a replacement for actual consultation with an attorney in any particular cases or trying circumstances. Sun Legal News articles and comments are posted for general and legal educational purposes only and should not be used to analyze any legal matters.

Boutique Law Firm Web Design